↓ Skip to main content

The epidemiology of septic shock in French intensive care units: the prospective multicenter cohort EPISS study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The epidemiology of septic shock in French intensive care units: the prospective multicenter cohort EPISS study
Published in
Critical Care, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc12598
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Pierre Quenot, Christine Binquet, Fady Kara, Olivier Martinet, Frederique Ganster, Jean-Christophe Navellou, Vincent Castelain, Damien Barraud, Joel Cousson, Guillaume Louis, Pierre Perez, Khaldoun Kuteifan, Alain Noirot, Julio Badie, Chaouki Mezher, Henry Lessire, Arnaud Pavon

Abstract

To provide up-to-date information on the prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in a cohort of septic shock patients in intensive care units (ICUs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 14%
Other 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 39 26%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,426,350
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,363
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,161
of 205,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#72
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.