You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: a before-after intervention study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-92 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dianne J Russell, Lisa M Rivard, Stephen D Walter, Peter L Rosenbaum, Lori Roxborough, Dianne Cameron, Johanna Darrah, Doreen J Bartlett, Steven E Hanna, Lisa M Avery |
| Abstract |
The use of measurement tools is an essential part of good evidence-based practice; however, physiotherapists (PTs) are not always confident when selecting, administering, and interpreting these tools. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted knowledge translation intervention, using PTs as knowledge brokers (KBs) to facilitate the use in clinical practice of four evidence-based measurement tools designed to evaluate and understand motor function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The KB model evaluated in this study was designed to overcome many of the barriers to research transfer identified in the literature. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 18% |
| Researcher | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 24% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 16% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#15,267,294
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,552
of 1,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,205
of 179,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.