You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detailed analysis of metagenome datasets obtained from biogas-producing microbial communities residing in biogas reactors does not indicate the presence of putative pathogenic microorganisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-6834-6-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Felix G Eikmeyer, Antje Rademacher, Angelika Hanreich, Magdalena Hennig, Sebastian Jaenicke, Irena Maus, Daniel Wibberg, Martha Zakrzewski, Alfred Pühler, Michael Klocke, Andreas Schlüter |
| Abstract |
In recent years biogas plants in Germany have been supposed to be involved in amplification and dissemination of pathogenic bacteria causing severe infections in humans and animals. In particular, biogas plants are discussed to contribute to the spreading of Escherichia coli infections in humans or chronic botulism in cattle caused by Clostridium botulinum. Metagenome datasets of microbial communities from an agricultural biogas plant as well as from anaerobic lab-scale digesters operating at different temperatures and conditions were analyzed for the presence of putative pathogenic bacteria and virulence determinants by various bioinformatic approaches. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Estonia | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#944
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,471
of 212,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#29
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.