You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolynn Patten, Elizabeth G Condliffe, Christine A Dairaghi, Peter S Lum |
| Abstract |
Repetitive task practice is argued to drive neural plasticity following stroke. However, current evidence reveals that hemiparetic weakness impairs the capacity to perform, and practice, movements appropriately. Here we investigated how power training (i.e., high-intensity, dynamic resistance training) affects recovery of upper-extremity motor function post-stroke. We hypothesized that power training, as a component of upper-extremity rehabilitation, would promote greater functional gains than functional task practice without deleterious consequences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 350 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 86 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 6% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 10% |
| Unknown | 108 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,260,868
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#93
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,632
of 287,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.