↓ Skip to main content

Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concurrent neuromechanical and functional gains following upper-extremity power training post-stroke
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolynn Patten, Elizabeth G Condliffe, Christine A Dairaghi, Peter S Lum

Abstract

Repetitive task practice is argued to drive neural plasticity following stroke. However, current evidence reveals that hemiparetic weakness impairs the capacity to perform, and practice, movements appropriately. Here we investigated how power training (i.e., high-intensity, dynamic resistance training) affects recovery of upper-extremity motor function post-stroke. We hypothesized that power training, as a component of upper-extremity rehabilitation, would promote greater functional gains than functional task practice without deleterious consequences.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 266 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 18%
Student > Bachelor 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 20%
Sports and Recreations 26 9%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Engineering 13 5%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 72 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,722,731
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#234
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,035
of 168,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them