↓ Skip to main content

Lymphatic filariasis in Papua New Guinea: distribution at district level and impact of mass drug administration, 1980 to 2011

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lymphatic filariasis in Papua New Guinea: distribution at district level and impact of mass drug administration, 1980 to 2011
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia M Graves, Leo Makita, Melinda Susapu, Molly A Brady, Wayne Melrose, Corinne Capuano, Zaixing Zhang, Luo Dapeng, Masayo Ozaki, David Reeve, Kazuyo Ichimori, Walter M Kazadi, Frederick Michna, Moses J Bockarie, Louise A Kelly-Hope

Abstract

Lymphatic filariasis (LF) caused by Wuchereria bancrofti is present at high prevalence in some parts of Papua New Guinea. However, there has been no rigorous data-based representative assessment of nationwide prevalence of LF. The LF programme has been daunted by the scope of the problem, and progress on mass drug administration (MDA) has been slow and lacking in resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 22 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Environmental Science 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,630,858
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,392
of 5,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,413
of 294,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#26
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.