You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interpretation of white blood cell counts in the cerebrospinal fluid of neonates with traumatic lumbar puncture: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, August 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12887-022-03548-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gema García-De la Rosa, Silvia De las Heras-Flórez, Jorge Rodríguez-Afonso, Mercedes Carretero-Pérez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Researcher | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,867,328
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#934
of 3,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,514
of 403,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#31
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.