↓ Skip to main content

A pilot randomized controlled trial to promote healthful fish consumption during pregnancy: The Food for Thought Study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A pilot randomized controlled trial to promote healthful fish consumption during pregnancy: The Food for Thought Study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Oken, Lauren B Guthrie, Arienne Bloomingdale, Deborah N Platek, Sarah Price, Jess Haines, Matthew W Gillman, Sjurdur F Olsen, David C Bellinger, Robert O Wright

Abstract

Nutritionists advise pregnant women to eat fish to obtain adequate docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an essential nutrient important for optimal brain development. However, concern exists that this advice will lead to excess intake of methylmercury, a developmental neurotoxicant.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 22%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 17 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2014.
All research outputs
#1,955,677
of 21,346,377 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#483
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,295
of 174,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,786 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them