↓ Skip to main content

Strategies for lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
85 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies for lung- and diaphragm-protective ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a physiological trial
Published in
Critical Care, August 2022
DOI 10.1186/s13054-022-04123-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Dianti, Samira Fard, Jenna Wong, Timothy C. Y. Chan, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Eddy Fan, Marcelo B. Passos Amato, John Granton, Lisa Burry, W. Darlene Reid, Binghao Zhang, Damian Ratano, Shaf Keshavjee, Arthur S. Slutsky, Laurent J. Brochard, Niall D. Ferguson, Ewan C. Goligher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 21%
Researcher 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 58%
Unspecified 5 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#547,928
of 22,860,626 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#376
of 6,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,775
of 429,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#13
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,860,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.