You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The epidemiology of food allergy in Europe: protocol for a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-3-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bright I Nwaru, Sukhmeet S Panesar, Lennart Hickstein, Tamara Rader, Thomas Werfel, Antonella Muraro, Karin Hoffmann‐Sommergruber, Graham Roberts, Aziz Sheikh, European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology FoodAllergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines group |
| Abstract |
The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is in the process of developing its Guideline for Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis, and this protocol of a systematic review is one of seven inter-linked evidence syntheses that are being undertaken in order to provide a state-of-the-art synopsis of the current evidence base in relation to epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis and clinical management and impact on quality of life, which will be used to inform the formulation of clinical recommendations.The aims of the systematic review will be to understand and describe the epidemiology of food allergy, i.e. frequency, risk factors and outcomes of patients suffering from food allergy, and to describe how these characteristics vary by person, place and time. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 27% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2013.
All research outputs
#2,811,029
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#167
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,159
of 212,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.