You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Potential application of the haematology analyser XN-31 prototype for field malaria surveillance in Kenya
Malaria Journal, September 2022
Wataru Kagaya, Ikki Takehara, Kyoko Kurihara, Michael Maina, Chim W. Chan, Gordon Okomo, James Kongere, Jesse Gitaka, Akira Kaneko
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||60%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||20%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||20%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||2||10%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||14%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||5%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||1||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2022.
All research outputs
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
of 5,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 433,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.