↓ Skip to main content

Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery
Published in
Implementation Science, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Bonfill, Marta Roqué, Marta Beatriz Aller, Dimelza Osorio, Carles Foradada, Àngels Vives, David Rigau

Abstract

The objective of this research is to generate quality of care indicators from systematic reviews to assess the appropriateness of obstetric care in hospitals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 30%
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,169,775
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#981
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,795
of 205,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.