You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of quality of care indicators from systematic reviews: the case of hospital delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-42 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xavier Bonfill, Marta Roqué, Marta Beatriz Aller, Dimelza Osorio, Carles Foradada, Àngels Vives, David Rigau |
Abstract |
The objective of this research is to generate quality of care indicators from systematic reviews to assess the appropriateness of obstetric care in hospitals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Ireland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 30% |
Researcher | 13 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,169,775
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#981
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,795
of 205,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.