↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to reduce neonatal mortality from neonatal tetanus in low and middle income countries - a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to reduce neonatal mortality from neonatal tetanus in low and middle income countries - a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adeel Ahmed Khan, Aysha Zahidie, Fauziah Rabbani

Abstract

In 1988, WHO estimated around 787,000 newborns deaths due to neonatal tetanus. Despite few success stories majority of the Low and Middle Income Countries (LMICs) are still struggling to reduce neonatal mortality due to neonatal tetanus. We conducted a systematic review to understand the interventions that have had a substantial effect on reducing neonatal mortality rate due to neonatal tetanus in LMICs and come up with feasible recommendations for decreasing neonatal tetanus in the Pakistani setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Researcher 18 11%
Other 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 35 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 15%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 40 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,654,579
of 17,658,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,858
of 11,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,092
of 163,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,658,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them