↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the uptake of neonatal and young infant referrals by community health workers to public health facilities in an urban informal settlement, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of the uptake of neonatal and young infant referrals by community health workers to public health facilities in an urban informal settlement, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duduzile Nsibande, Tanya Doherty, Petrida Ijumba, Mark Tomlinson, Debra Jackson, David Sanders, Joy Lawn

Abstract

Globally, 40% of the 7.6 million deaths of children under five every year occur in the neonatal period (first 28 days after birth). Increased and earlier recognition of illness facilitated by community health workers (CHWs), coupled with effective referral systems can result in better child health outcomes. This model has not been tested in a peri-urban poor setting in Africa, or in a high HIV context.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 290 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 26%
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 55 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 85 28%
Social Sciences 46 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 14%
Psychology 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 41 14%
Unknown 66 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,279,217
of 23,692,259 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,538
of 7,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,917
of 287,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,692,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.