Title |
Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-7-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James M Whitacre |
Abstract |
A full accounting of biological robustness remains elusive; both in terms of the mechanisms by which robustness is achieved and the forces that have caused robustness to grow over evolutionary time. Although its importance to topics such as ecosystem services and resilience is well recognized, the broader relationship between robustness and evolution is only starting to be fully appreciated. A renewed interest in this relationship has been prompted by evidence that mutational robustness can play a positive role in the discovery of adaptive innovations (evolvability) and evidence of an intimate relationship between robustness and complexity in biology.This paper offers a new perspective on the mechanics of evolution and the origins of complexity, robustness, and evolvability. Here we explore the hypothesis that degeneracy, a partial overlap in the functioning of multi-functional components, plays a central role in the evolution and robustness of complex forms. In support of this hypothesis, we present evidence that degeneracy is a fundamental source of robustness, it is intimately tied to multi-scaled complexity, and it establishes conditions that are necessary for system evolvability. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 30% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
India | 1 | 10% |
Sweden | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Chile | 2 | <1% |
Hungary | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 3% |
Unknown | 268 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 24% |
Researcher | 69 | 23% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 8% |
Professor | 23 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
Other | 63 | 21% |
Unknown | 33 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 30% |
Computer Science | 34 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 10% |
Engineering | 20 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 18 | 6% |
Other | 74 | 24% |
Unknown | 38 | 12% |