You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Osteopathic intervention in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-129 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul J Orrock, Stephen P Myers |
Abstract |
Chronic Non Specific Low Back Pain (CNSLBP) is a common, complex and disabling condition that has been present for longer than three months and is not caused by a serious pathology. Osteopaths are health practitioners who commonly diagnose and treat CNSLBP patients using a complex set of interventions that includes manual therapy. The study aimed to complete a Systematic Review of clinical research into osteopathic intervention in CNSLBP using a rigorous assessment of study quality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Saudi Arabia | 4 | 13% |
Spain | 4 | 13% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Italy | 2 | 6% |
France | 2 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Andorra | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 29 | 91% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 425 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 97 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 75 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 6% |
Other | 88 | 20% |
Unknown | 87 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 174 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 74 | 17% |
Sports and Recreations | 20 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 10 | 2% |
Other | 48 | 11% |
Unknown | 98 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#806,765
of 25,059,640 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#105
of 4,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,567
of 204,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,059,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.