↓ Skip to main content

Reducing neonatal infections in south and south central Vietnam: the views of healthcare providers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing neonatal infections in south and south central Vietnam: the views of healthcare providers
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-51
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Trevisanuto, Gaston Arnolda, Tran Dinh Chien, Ngo Minh Xuan, Le Thi Anh Thu, Danica Kumara, Ornella Lincetto, Luciano Moccia

Abstract

Infection causes neonatal mortality in both high and low income countries. While simple interventions to prevent neonatal infection are available, they are often poorly understood and implemented by clinicians. A basic understanding of healthcare providers' perceptions of infection control provides a platform for improving current practices. Our aim was to explore the views of healthcare providers in provincial hospitals in south and south central Vietnam to inform the design of programmes to improve neonatal infection prevention and control.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 15 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#4,983,402
of 16,710,634 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#917
of 2,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,273
of 158,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,710,634 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them