You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reducing neonatal infections in south and south central Vietnam: the views of healthcare providers
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-51 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniele Trevisanuto, Gaston Arnolda, Tran Dinh Chien, Ngo Minh Xuan, Le Thi Anh Thu, Danica Kumara, Ornella Lincetto, Luciano Moccia |
Abstract |
Infection causes neonatal mortality in both high and low income countries. While simple interventions to prevent neonatal infection are available, they are often poorly understood and implemented by clinicians. A basic understanding of healthcare providers' perceptions of infection control provides a platform for improving current practices. Our aim was to explore the views of healthcare providers in provincial hospitals in south and south central Vietnam to inform the design of programmes to improve neonatal infection prevention and control. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
Mexico | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Other | 25 | 28% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 21 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,250,113
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,470
of 3,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,186
of 212,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#24
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.