You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
| Title |
Reliability and validity of the Microsoft Kinect for evaluating static foot posture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-6-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin F Mentiplay, Ross A Clark, Alexandra Mullins, Adam L Bryant, Simon Bartold, Kade Paterson |
| Abstract |
The evaluation of foot posture in a clinical setting is useful to screen for potential injury, however disagreement remains as to which method has the greatest clinical utility. An inexpensive and widely available imaging system, the Microsoft Kinect™, may possess the characteristics to objectively evaluate static foot posture in a clinical setting with high accuracy. The aim of this study was to assess the intra-rater reliability and validity of this system for assessing static foot posture. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 30% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 23% |
| Unknown | 24 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 20% |
| Engineering | 41 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 33 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |