You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of an office worksite-based yoga program on heart rate variability: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Birinder S Cheema, Angelique Houridis, Lisa Busch, Verena Raschke-Cheema, Geoff W Melville, Paul W Marshall, Dennis Chang, Bianca Machliss, Chris Lonsdale, Julia Bowman, Ben Colagiuri |
| Abstract |
Chronic work-related stress is an independent risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases and associated mortality, particularly when compounded by a sedentary work environment. The purpose of this study was to determine if an office worksite-based hatha yoga program could improve physiological stress, evaluated via heart rate variability (HRV), and associated health-related outcomes in a cohort of office workers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 382 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 76 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 11% |
| Researcher | 36 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 19% |
| Unknown | 92 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 23% |
| Psychology | 51 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 33 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 44 | 11% |
| Unknown | 112 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,273,828
of 23,954,951 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#609
of 3,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,627
of 202,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,954,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.