You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Will mothers of sick children help their husbands to stop smoking after receiving a brief intervention from nurses? Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sophia S C Chan, David C N Wong, Tai-Hing Lam |
Abstract |
Second-hand smoke is a severe health hazard for children. Clinical guidelines suggest that nurses advise smoking parents to quit when they accompany their sick children to paediatric settings, but the guidelines did not mention what nurses can do if the parents are not with the children. This study examines the effectiveness of a low-intensity, nurse-led health instructional initiative for non-smoking mothers, to motivate them to take action to help their husbands stop smoking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 12% |
Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 17% |
Psychology | 12 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#16,099,609
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,103
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,364
of 201,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#38
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.