↓ Skip to main content

Nosema spp. infection and its negative effects on honey bees (Apis mellifera iberiensis) at the colony level

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nosema spp. infection and its negative effects on honey bees (Apis mellifera iberiensis) at the colony level
Published in
Veterinary Research, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1297-9716-44-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Botías, Raquel Martín-Hernández, Laura Barrios, Aránzazu Meana, Mariano Higes

Abstract

Nosemosis caused by the microsporidia Nosema apis and Nosema ceranae are among the most common pathologies affecting adult honey bees. N. apis infection has been associated with a reduced lifespan of infected bees and increased winter mortality, and its negative impact on colony strength and productivity has been described in several studies. By contrast, when the effects of nosemosis type C, caused by N. ceranae infection, have been analysed at the colony level, these studies have largely focused on collapse as a response to infection without addressing the potential sub-clinical effects on colony strength and productivity. Given the spread and prevalence of N. ceranae worldwide, we set out here to characterize the sub-clinical and clinical signs of N. ceranae infection on colony strength and productivity. We evaluated the evolution of 50 honey bee colonies naturally infected by Nosema (mainly N. ceranae) over a one year period. Under our experimental conditions, N. ceranae infection was highly pathogenic for honey bee colonies, producing significant reductions in colony size, brood rearing and honey production. These deleterious effects at the colony level may affect beekeeping profitability and have serious consequences on pollination. Further research is necessary to identify possible treatments or beekeeping techniques that will limit the rapid spread of this dangerous emerging disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 209 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Researcher 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 56 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 6%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,550,345
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#38
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,244
of 212,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.