↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-15-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Boldt, Alexander W Leber, Klaus Bonaventura, Christian Sohns, Martin Stula, Alexander Huppertz, Wilhelm Haverkamp, Marc Dorenkamp

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated a superior diagnostic accuracy of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to determine the comparative cost-effectiveness of CMR versus single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Other 10 17%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Engineering 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2013.
All research outputs
#8,595,692
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#715
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,578
of 212,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.