↓ Skip to main content

A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microbiomic data

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microbiomic data
Published in
Microbiome, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-1-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Statnikov, Mikael Henaff, Varun Narendra, Kranti Konganti, Zhiguo Li, Liying Yang, Zhiheng Pei, Martin J Blaser, Constantin F Aliferis, Alexander V Alekseyenko

Abstract

Recent advances in next-generation DNA sequencing enable rapid high-throughput quantitation of microbial community composition in human samples, opening up a new field of microbiomics. One of the promises of this field is linking abundances of microbial taxa to phenotypic and physiological states, which can inform development of new diagnostic, personalized medicine, and forensic modalities. Prior research has demonstrated the feasibility of applying machine learning methods to perform body site and subject classification with microbiomic data. However, it is currently unknown which classifiers perform best among the many available alternatives for classification with microbiomic data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 5%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 219 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 26%
Researcher 51 22%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 11 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 15%
Computer Science 35 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 40 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,055,781
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,138
of 1,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,041
of 203,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.