↓ Skip to main content

The erratic mitochondrial clock: variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA diversity across birds and mammals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
221 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
411 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The erratic mitochondrial clock: variations of mutation rate, not population size, affect mtDNA diversity across birds and mammals
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-9-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benoit Nabholz, Sylvain Glémin, Nicolas Galtier

Abstract

During the last ten years, major advances have been made in characterizing and understanding the evolution of mitochondrial DNA, the most popular marker of molecular biodiversity. Several important results were recently reported using mammals as model organisms, including (i) the absence of relationship between mitochondrial DNA diversity and life-history or ecological variables, (ii) the absence of prominent adaptive selection, contrary to what was found in invertebrates, and (iii) the unexpectedly large variation in neutral substitution rate among lineages, revealing a possible link with species maximal longevity. We propose to challenge these results thanks to the bird/mammal comparison. Direct estimates of population size are available in birds, and this group presents striking life-history trait differences with mammals (higher mass-specific metabolic rate and longevity). These properties make birds the ideal model to directly test for population size effects, and to discriminate between competing hypotheses about the causes of substitution rate variation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 17 4%
Brazil 4 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 372 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 110 27%
Researcher 98 24%
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 5%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 38 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 282 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 10%
Environmental Science 27 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 <1%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 <1%
Other 9 2%
Unknown 44 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,102,548
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,019
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,285
of 108,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.