↓ Skip to main content

Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: considering the inconsistent results

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: considering the inconsistent results
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, March 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-8-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerbrand J Izaks

Abstract

A meta-analysis found that high dose vitamin D, different from low dose, decreased fracture risk by 23% for any nonvertebral fracture and by 26% for hip fracture. Unfortunately, however, this effect was not confirmed by recent trials. The aim of this paper is to explore if this inconsistency can be attributed to publication bias or heterogeneity of the trials.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Philosophy 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2009.
All research outputs
#2,654,248
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#534
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,970
of 76,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.