↓ Skip to main content

A standard variation file format for human genome sequences

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
25 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A standard variation file format for human genome sequences
Published in
Genome Biology, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin G Reese, Barry Moore, Colin Batchelor, Fidel Salas, Fiona Cunningham, Gabor T Marth, Lincoln Stein, Paul Flicek, Mark Yandell, Karen Eilbeck

Abstract

Here we describe the Genome Variation Format (GVF) and the 10Gen dataset. GVF, an extension of Generic Feature Format version 3 (GFF3), is a simple tab-delimited format for DNA variant files, which uses Sequence Ontology to describe genome variation data. The 10Gen dataset, ten human genomes in GVF format, is freely available for community analysis from the Sequence Ontology website and from an Amazon elastic block storage (EBS) snapshot for use in Amazon's EC2 cloud computing environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 9%
Belgium 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 149 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 24%
Other 13 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Student > Master 13 7%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 10 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 111 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 12%
Computer Science 21 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 18 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,313,461
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,384
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,796
of 103,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.