↓ Skip to main content

Immune mechanisms of protection: can adjuvants rise to the challenge?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune mechanisms of protection: can adjuvants rise to the challenge?
Published in
BMC Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-8-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy S McKee, Megan KL MacLeod, John W Kappler, Philippa Marrack

Abstract

For many diseases vaccines are lacking or only partly effective. Research on protective immunity and adjuvants that generate vigorous immune responses may help generate effective vaccines against such pathogens.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 114 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 26%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 10 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2011.
All research outputs
#2,435,641
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#697
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,334
of 94,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.