↓ Skip to main content

Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
266 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fuzzy species among recombinogenic bacteria
Published in
BMC Biology, March 2005
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-3-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

William P Hanage, Christophe Fraser, Brian G Spratt

Abstract

It is a matter of ongoing debate whether a universal species concept is possible for bacteria. Indeed, it is not clear whether closely related isolates of bacteria typically form discrete genotypic clusters that can be assigned as species. The most challenging test of whether species can be clearly delineated is provided by analysis of large populations of closely-related, highly recombinogenic, bacteria that colonise the same body site. We have used concatenated sequences of seven house-keeping loci from 770 strains of 11 named Neisseria species, and phylogenetic trees, to investigate whether genotypic clusters can be resolved among these recombinogenic bacteria and, if so, the extent to which they correspond to named species.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 8 3%
Germany 6 2%
Spain 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 208 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 26%
Researcher 56 23%
Professor 21 9%
Student > Master 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 139 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 5%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 36 15%