↓ Skip to main content

A molecular phylogeny of Dorylus army ants provides evidence for multiple evolutionary transitions in foraging niche

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A molecular phylogeny of Dorylus army ants provides evidence for multiple evolutionary transitions in foraging niche
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-7-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel JC Kronauer, Caspar Schöning, Lars B Vilhelmsen, Jacobus J Boomsma

Abstract

Army ants are the prime arthropod predators in tropical forests, with huge colonies and an evolutionary derived nomadic life style. Five of the six recognized subgenera of Old World Dorylus army ants forage in the soil, whereas some species of the sixth subgenus (Anomma) forage in the leaf-litter and some as conspicuous swarm raiders on the forest floor and in the lower vegetation (the infamous driver ants). Here we use a combination of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences to reconstruct the phylogeny of the Dorylus s.l. army ants and to infer the evolutionary transitions in foraging niche and associated morphological adaptations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Nepal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 82 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor 6 6%
Other 6 6%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Psychology 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,863,888
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#760
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,227
of 90,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#7
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.