↓ Skip to main content

Real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock—observation is necessarily ‘theory-laden’

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-life use of vasopressors and inotropes in cardiogenic shock—observation is necessarily ‘theory-laden’
Published in
Critical Care, January 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13054-016-1473-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray, Samiran, Cvetkovic, Mirjana, Lutman, Daniel H, Pathan, Nazima, Ramnarayan, Padmanabhan, Inwald, David P, Peters, Mark J, Samiran Ray, Mirjana Cvetkovic, Daniel H. Lutman, Nazima Pathan, Padmanabhan Ramnarayan, David P. Inwald, Mark J. Peters, Ray, S, Cvetkovic, M, Lutman, DH, Pathan, N, Ramnarayan, P, Inwald, DP, Peters, MJ

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Sports and Recreations 1 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,272,001
of 11,609,687 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,183
of 3,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,735
of 323,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,609,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.