↓ Skip to main content

High resolution melting analysis of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA in KRASexon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High resolution melting analysis of KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA in KRASexon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joana G Guedes, Isabel Veiga, Patrícia Rocha, Pedro Pinto, Carla Pinto, Manuela Pinheiro, Ana Peixoto, Maria Fragoso, Ana Raimundo, Paula Ferreira, Manuela Machado, Nuno Sousa, Paula Lopes, António Araújo, Joana Macedo, Fernando Alves, Camila Coutinho, Rui Henrique, Lúcio L Santos, Manuel R Teixeira

Abstract

KRAS is an EGFR effector in the RAS/RAF/ERK cascade that is mutated in about 40% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Activating mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS gene are the only established negative predictors of response to anti-EGFR therapy and patients whose tumors harbor such mutations are not candidates for therapy. However, 40 to 60% of wild-type cases do not respond to anti-EGFR therapy, suggesting the involvement of other genes that act downstream of EGFR in the RAS-RAF-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways or activating KRAS mutations at other locations of the gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 25%
Other 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 11%
Professor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 46%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,149,957
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,827
of 8,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,025
of 200,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#54
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,258 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.