↓ Skip to main content

Attribution of net carbon change by disturbance type across forest lands of the conterminous United States

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 223)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
59 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attribution of net carbon change by disturbance type across forest lands of the conterminous United States
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13021-016-0066-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. L. Harris, S. C. Hagen, S. S. Saatchi, T. R. H. Pearson, C. W. Woodall, G. M. Domke, B. H. Braswell, B. F. Walters, S. Brown, W. Salas, A. Fore, Y. Yu

Abstract

Locating terrestrial sources and sinks of carbon (C) will be critical to developing strategies that contribute to the climate change mitigation goals of the Paris Agreement. Here we present spatially resolved estimates of net C change across United States (US) forest lands between 2006 and 2010 and attribute them to natural and anthropogenic processes. Forests in the conterminous US sequestered -460 ± 48 Tg C year(-1), while C losses from disturbance averaged 191 ± 10 Tg C year(-1). Combining estimates of net C losses and gains results in net carbon change of -269 ± 49 Tg C year(-1). New forests gained -8 ± 1 Tg C year(-1), while deforestation resulted in losses of 6 ± 1 Tg C year(-1). Forest land remaining forest land lost 185 ± 10 Tg C year(-1) to various disturbances; these losses were compensated by net carbon gains of -452 ± 48 Tg C year(-1). C loss in the southern US was highest (105 ± 6 Tg C year(-1)) with the highest fractional contributions from harvest (92%) and wind (5%). C loss in the western US (44 ± 3 Tg C year(-1)) was due predominantly to harvest (66%), fire (15%), and insect damage (13%). The northern US had the lowest C loss (41 ± 2 Tg C year(-1)) with the most significant proportional contributions from harvest (86%), insect damage (9%), and conversion (3%). Taken together, these disturbances reduced the estimated potential C sink of US forests by 42%. The framework presented here allows for the integration of ground and space observations to more fully inform US forest C policy and monitoring efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 105 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 34 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 9%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 40 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 509. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#50,749
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#2
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,009
of 313,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them