↓ Skip to main content

Selection and geographic isolation influence hummingbird speciation: genetic, acoustic and morphological divergence in the wedge-tailed sabrewing (Campylopterus curvipennis)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selection and geographic isolation influence hummingbird speciation: genetic, acoustic and morphological divergence in the wedge-tailed sabrewing (Campylopterus curvipennis)
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clementina González, Juan Francisco Ornelas, Carla Gutiérrez-Rodríguez

Abstract

Mesoamerica is one of the most threatened biodiversity hotspots in the world, yet we are far from understanding the geologic history and the processes driving population divergence and speciation for most endemic taxa. In species with highly differentiated populations selective and/or neutral factors can induce rapid changes to traits involved in mate choice, promoting reproductive isolation between allopatric populations that can eventually lead to speciation. We present the results of genetic differentiation, and explore drift and selection effects in promoting acoustic and morphological divergence among populations of Campylopterus curvipennis, a lekking hummingbird with an extraordinary vocal variability across Mesoamerica.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
United States 5 2%
Mexico 3 1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 185 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 23%
Student > Master 42 21%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 8 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 159 78%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 8%
Environmental Science 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 12 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,613,667
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#958
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,593
of 194,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#13
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.