↓ Skip to main content

The susceptibility of Anopheles lesteri to infection with Korean strain of Plasmodium vivax

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The susceptibility of Anopheles lesteri to infection with Korean strain of Plasmodium vivax
Published in
Malaria Journal, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-8-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deepak Joshi, Wej Choochote, Mi-Hyun Park, Jung-Yeon Kim, Tong-Soo Kim, Wannapa Suwonkerd, Gi-Sik Min

Abstract

Following its recent re-emergence, malaria has gained renewed attention as a serious infectious disease in Korea. Three species of the Hyrcanusgroup, Anopheles lesteri, Anopheles sinensis and Anopheles pullus, have long been suspected malaria vectors. However, opinions about their vector ability are controversial. The present study was designed with the aim of determining the susceptibility of these mosquitoes to a Korean isolate of Plasmodium vivax. Also, An. sinensis is primarily suspected to be vector of malaria in Korea, but in Thailand, the same species is described to have less medical importance. Therefore, comparative susceptibility of Thai and Korean strains of An. sinensis with Thai strain of P. vivax may be helpful to understand whether these geographically different strains exhibit differences in their susceptibility or not.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Madagascar 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,654,095
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#602
of 5,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,079
of 94,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.