↓ Skip to main content

Untangling spider silk evolution with spidroin terminal domains

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
141 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Untangling spider silk evolution with spidroin terminal domains
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-243
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica E Garb, Nadia A Ayoub, Cheryl Y Hayashi

Abstract

Spidroins are a unique family of large, structural proteins that make up the bulk of spider silk fibers. Due to the highly variable nature of their repetitive sequences, spidroin evolutionary relationships have principally been determined from their non-repetitive carboxy (C)-terminal domains, though they offer limited character data. The few known spidroin amino (N)-terminal domains have been difficult to obtain, but potentially contain critical phylogenetic information for reconstructing the diversification of spider silks. Here we used silk gland expression data (ESTs) from highly divergent species to evaluate the functional significance and phylogenetic utility of spidroin N-terminal domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 129 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 21%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 25 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 22%
Engineering 9 6%
Chemistry 7 5%
Materials Science 5 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,532,315
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#362
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,962
of 104,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.