↓ Skip to main content

Intragenomic conflict in populations infected by Parthenogenesis Inducing Wolbachia ends with irreversible loss of sexual reproduction

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intragenomic conflict in populations infected by Parthenogenesis Inducing Wolbachia ends with irreversible loss of sexual reproduction
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-10-229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Stouthamer, James E Russell, Fabrice Vavre, Leonard Nunney

Abstract

The maternally inherited, bacterial symbiont, parthenogenesis inducing (PI) Wolbachia, causes females in some haplodiploid insects to produce daughters from both fertilized and unfertilized eggs. The symbionts, with their maternal inheritance, benefit from inducing the production of exclusively daughters, however the optimal sex ratio for the nuclear genome is more male-biased. Here we examine through models how an infection with PI-Wolbachia in a previously uninfected population leads to a genomic conflict between PI-Wolbachia and the nuclear genome. In most natural populations infected with PI-Wolbachia the infection has gone to fixation and sexual reproduction is impossible, specifically because the females have lost their ability to fertilize eggs, even when mated with functional males.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 3%
Switzerland 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 116 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 21%
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 16 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 18%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Philosophy 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 16 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2010.
All research outputs
#6,443,722
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,412
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,048
of 103,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#22
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.