↓ Skip to main content

Computational models for in-vitro anti-tubercular activity of molecules based on high-throughput chemical biology screening datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational models for in-vitro anti-tubercular activity of molecules based on high-throughput chemical biology screening datasets
Published in
BMC Pharmacology, March 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2210-12-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinita Periwal, Shireesha Kishtapuram, Open Source Drug Discovery Consortium, Vinod Scaria

Abstract

The emergence of Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in pandemic proportions throughout the world and the paucity of novel therapeutics for tuberculosis have re-iterated the need to accelerate the discovery of novel molecules with anti-tubercular activity. Though high-throughput screens for anti-tubercular activity are available, they are expensive, tedious and time-consuming to be performed on large scales. Thus, there remains an unmet need to prioritize the molecules that are taken up for biological screens to save on cost and time. Computational methods including Machine Learning have been widely employed to build classifiers for high-throughput virtual screens to prioritize molecules for further analysis. The availability of datasets based on high-throughput biological screens or assays in public domain makes computational methods a plausible proposition for building predictive models. In addition, this approach would save significantly on the cost, effort and time required to run high throughput screens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 12%
Computer Science 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Chemistry 5 6%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,134
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology
#54
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,514
of 161,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.