You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of apples and specific apple components on the cecal environment of conventional rats: role of apple pectin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Microbiology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2180-10-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tine R Licht, Max Hansen, Anders Bergström, Morten Poulsen, Britta N Krath, Jaroslaw Markowski, Lars O Dragsted, Andrea Wilcks |
| Abstract |
Our study was part of the large European project ISAFRUIT aiming to reveal the biological explanations for the epidemiologically well-established health effects of fruits. The objective was to identify effects of apple and apple product consumption on the composition of the cecal microbial community in rats, as well as on a number of cecal parameters, which may be influenced by a changed microbiota. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#528,677
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#14
of 3,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,789
of 172,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.