↓ Skip to main content

A decadal view of biodiversity informatics: challenges and priorities

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
36 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A decadal view of biodiversity informatics: challenges and priorities
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6785-13-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Hardisty, Dave Roberts, The Biodiversity Informatics Community

Abstract

Biodiversity informatics plays a central enabling role in the research community's efforts to address scientific conservation and sustainability issues. Great strides have been made in the past decade establishing a framework for sharing data, where taxonomy and systematics has been perceived as the most prominent discipline involved. To some extent this is inevitable, given the use of species names as the pivot around which information is organised. To address the urgent questions around conservation, land-use, environmental change, sustainability, food security and ecosystem services that are facing Governments worldwide, we need to understand how the ecosystem works. So, we need a systems approach to understanding biodiversity that moves significantly beyond taxonomy and species observations. Such an approach needs to look at the whole system to address species interactions, both with their environment and with other species.It is clear that some barriers to progress are sociological, basically persuading people to use the technological solutions that are already available. This is best addressed by developing more effective systems that deliver immediate benefit to the user, hiding the majority of the technology behind simple user interfaces. An infrastructure should be a space in which activities take place and, as such, should be effectively invisible.This community consultation paper positions the role of biodiversity informatics, for the next decade, presenting the actions needed to link the various biodiversity infrastructures invisibly and to facilitate understanding that can support both business and policy-makers. The community considers the goal in biodiversity informatics to be full integration of the biodiversity research community, including citizens' science, through a commonly-shared, sustainable e-infrastructure across all sub-disciplines that reliably serves science and society alike.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Brazil 11 2%
United Kingdom 9 2%
Germany 7 1%
France 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Finland 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 19 4%
Unknown 394 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 120 26%
Student > Master 81 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 13%
Other 37 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 6%
Other 89 19%
Unknown 49 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 193 41%
Environmental Science 77 16%
Computer Science 57 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 3%
Other 52 11%
Unknown 61 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2021.
All research outputs
#700,420
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#142
of 3,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,736
of 210,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.