↓ Skip to main content

Relative residential property value as a socio-economic status indicator for health research

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relative residential property value as a socio-economic status indicator for health research
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-12-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil T Coffee, Tony Lockwood, Graeme Hugo, Catherine Paquet, Natasha J Howard, Mark Daniel

Abstract

Residential property is reported as the most valuable asset people will own and therefore provides the potential to be used as a socio-economic status (SES) measure. Location is generally recognised as the most important determinant of residential property value.Extending the well-established relationship between poor health and socio-economic disadvantage and the role of residential property in the overall wealth of individuals, this study tested the predictive value of the Relative Location Factor (RLF), a SES measure designed to reflect the relationship between location and residential property value, and six cardiometabolic disease risk factors, central obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high density lipoprotein (HDL), hypertension, impaired fasting glucose, and high low density lipoprotein (LDL). These risk factors were also summed and expressed as a cumulative cardiometabolic risk (CMR) score.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 18 19%
Unknown 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,798,296
of 12,545,316 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#251
of 475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,356
of 144,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,545,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.