↓ Skip to main content

Early microbial and metabolomic signatures predict later onset of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
293 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early microbial and metabolomic signatures predict later onset of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants
Published in
Microbiome, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-1-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ardythe L Morrow, Anne J Lagomarcino, Kurt R Schibler, Diana H Taft, Zhuoteng Yu, Bo Wang, Mekibib Altaye, Michael Wagner, Dirk Gevers, Doyle V Ward, Michael A Kennedy, Curtis Huttenhower, David S Newburg

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a devastating intestinal disease that afflicts 10% of extremely preterm infants. The contribution of early intestinal colonization to NEC onset is not understood, and predictive biomarkers to guide prevention are lacking. We analyzed banked stool and urine samples collected prior to disease onset from infants <29 weeks gestational age, including 11 infants who developed NEC and 21 matched controls who survived free of NEC. Stool bacterial communities were profiled by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Urinary metabolomic profiles were assessed by NMR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Unknown 242 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Master 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Chemistry 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 70 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,001,160
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#777
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,166
of 195,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.