You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emergency and critical care services in Tanzania: a survey of ten hospitals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Baker, Edwin Lugazia, Jaran Eriksen, Victor Mwafongo, Lars Irestedt, David Konrad |
| Abstract |
While there is a need for good quality care for patients with serious reversible disease in all countries in the world, Emergency and Critical Care tends to be one of the weakest parts of health systems in low-income countries. We assessed the structure and availability of resources for Emergency and Critical Care in Tanzania in order to identify the priorities for improving care in this neglected specialty. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Belgium | 1 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,029,422
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,424
of 8,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,069
of 177,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#36
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.