You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wild food plants and wild edible fungi in two valleys of the Qinling Mountains (Shaanxi, central China)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-9-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yongxiang Kang, Łukasz Łuczaj, Jin Kang, Shijiao Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2016.
All research outputs
#16,123,626
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#506
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,762
of 213,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.