You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consistent high concentration of the viral microRNA BART17 in plasma samples from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients - evidence of non-exosomal transport
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Virology Journal, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-422x-10-119 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claire Gourzones, François-Régis Ferrand, Corinne Amiel, Benjamin Vérillaud, Ana Barat, Maryse Guérin, Charles-Henry Gattolliat, Aurore Gelin, Jihène Klibi, Arij Ben Chaaben, Véronique Schneider, Fethi Guemira, Joël Guigay, Philippe Lang, Anne-Sophie Jimenez-Pailhes, Pierre Busson |
| Abstract |
Because latent Epstein Barr (EBV)-infection is a specific characteristic of malignant nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), various molecules of viral origin are obvious candidate biomarkers in this disease. In a previous study, we could show in a few clinical samples that it was possible to detect a category of EBV microRNAs called miR-BARTs in the plasma of at least a fraction of NPC patients. The first aim of the present study was to investigate the status of circulating miR-BART17-5p (one of the miR-BARTs hereafter called miR-BART17) and EBV DNA in a larger series of NPC plasma samples. The second aim was to determine whether or not circulating miR-BART17 was carried by plasma exosomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 27% |
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#13,888,372
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#1,468
of 3,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,747
of 175,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#37
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.