You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Screening for latent tuberculosis in Norwegian health care workers: high frequency of discordant tuberculin skin test positive and interferon-gamma release assay negative results
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-353 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gerd Gran, Jörg Aßmus, Anne Ma Dyrhol-Riise |
Abstract |
Tuberculosis (TB) presents globally a significant health problem and health care workers (HCW) are at increased risk of contracting TB infection. There is no diagnostic gold standard for latent TB infection (LTBI), but both blood based interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) and the tuberculin skin test (TST) are used. According to the national guidelines, HCW who have been exposed for TB should be screened and offered preventive anti-TB chemotherapy, but the role of IGRA in HCW screening is still unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 67% |
Canada | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
Singapore | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 24% |
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 45% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 16% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,168,358
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,277
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,689
of 197,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#208
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.