You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analyzing the sources and nature of influence: how the Avahan program used evidence to influence HIV/AIDS prevention policy in India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-44 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nhan T Tran, Sara C Bennett, Rituparna Bishnu, Suneeta Singh |
Abstract |
Major investments by development partners in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often seek to develop a supportive policy environment. There is limited knowledge about the mechanisms that development partners use to influence government policy, or which mechanisms are effective. This study assessed the influence of Avahan, a large HIV/AIDS prevention program in India supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, on the development of HIV/AIDS policies in India, particularly the National AIDS Control Program III (NACP III). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 94 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 23% |
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Librarian | 4 | 4% |
Other | 21 | 22% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 23 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,474,988
of 25,820,938 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,021
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,872
of 210,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#16
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,820,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.