↓ Skip to main content

Multiphasic analysis of the temporal development of the distal gut microbiota in patients following ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiphasic analysis of the temporal development of the distal gut microbiota in patients following ileal pouch anal anastomosis
Published in
Microbiome, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/2049-2618-1-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent B Young, Laura H Raffals, Susan M Huse, Marius Vital, Dongjuan Dai, Patrick D Schloss, Jennifer M Brulc, Dionysios A Antonopoulos, Rose L Arrieta, John H Kwon, K Gautham Reddy, Nathaniel A Hubert, Sharon L Grim, Joseph H Vineis, Sushila Dalal, Hilary G Morrison, A Murat Eren, Folker Meyer, Thomas M Schmidt, James M Tiedje, Eugene B Chang, Mitchell L Sogin

Abstract

The indigenous gut microbiota are thought to play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of the abnormal inflammatory responses that are the hallmark of inflammatory bowel disease. Direct tests of the role of the gut microbiome in these disorders are typically limited by the fact that sampling of the microbiota generally occurs once disease has become manifest. This limitation could potentially be circumvented by studying patients who undergo total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for the definitive treatment of ulcerative colitis. A subset of patients who undergo IPAA develops an inflammatory condition known as pouchitis, which is thought to mirror the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis. Following the development of the microbiome of the pouch would allow characterization of the microbial community that predates the development of overt disease.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 23 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2013.
All research outputs
#20,190,878
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#1,417
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,949
of 194,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.