↓ Skip to main content

Increasing insecticide resistance in Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in Malawi, 2011–2015

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increasing insecticide resistance in Anopheles funestus and Anopheles arabiensis in Malawi, 2011–2015
Published in
Malaria Journal, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1610-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Themba Mzilahowa, Martin Chiumia, Rex B. Mbewe, Veronica T. Uzalili, Madalitso Luka-Banda, Anna Kutengule, Don P. Mathanga, Doreen Ali, John Chiphwanya, John Zoya, Shadreck Mulenga, Wilfred Dodoli, Jennifer Bergeson-Lockwood, Peter Troell, Jessica Oyugi, Kim Lindblade, John E. Gimnig

Abstract

Susceptibility of principal Anopheles malaria vectors to common insecticides was monitored over a 5-year period across Malawi to inform and guide the national malaria control programme. Adult blood-fed Anopheles spp. and larvae were collected from multiple sites in sixteen districts across the country between 2011 and 2015. First generation (F1) progeny aged 2-5 days old were tested for susceptibility, using standard WHO procedures, against pyrethroids (permethrin and deltamethrin), carbamates (bendiocarb and propoxur), organophosphates (malathion and pirimiphos-methyl) and an organochlorine (DDT). Mortality of Anopheles funestus to deltamethrin, permethrin, bendiocarb and propoxur declined significantly over the 5-year (2011-2015) monitoring period. There was wide variation in susceptibility to DDT but it was not associated with time. In contrast, An. funestus exhibited 100% mortality to the organophosphates (malathion and pirimiphos-methyl) at all sites tested. There was reduced mortality of Anopheles arabiensis to deltamethrin over time though this was not statistically significant. However, mortality of An. arabiensis exposed to permethrin declined significantly over time. Anopheles arabiensis exposed to DDT were more likely to be killed if there was high ITN coverage in the mosquito collection area the previous year. There were no other associations between mosquito mortality in a bioassay and ITN coverage or IRS implementation. Mortality of An. funestus from four sites exposed to deltamethrin alone ranged from 2 to 31% and from 41 to 94% when pre-exposed to the synergist piperonyl butoxide followed by deltamethrin. For permethrin alone, mortality ranged from 2 to 13% while mortality ranged from 63 to 100% when pre-exposed to PBO. Pyrethroid resistance was detected in An. funestus and An. arabiensis populations across Malawi and has worsened over the last 5 years. New insecticides and control strategies are urgently needed to reduce the burden of malaria in Malawi.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 22%
Student > Master 23 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 40 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 47 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2016.
All research outputs
#1,332,362
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#221
of 5,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,213
of 415,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.