↓ Skip to main content

Evidence based practice in clinical physiotherapy education: a qualitative interpretive description

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence based practice in clinical physiotherapy education: a qualitative interpretive description
Published in
BMC Medical Education, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina R Olsen, Peter Bradley, Kirsten Lomborg, Monica W Nortvedt

Abstract

Health care undergraduate students are expected to practice evidence-based after they graduate. Previous research indicates that students face several problems with transferring evidence-based practice to real patient situations. Few studies have explored reasons for this. The aim of this study was to explore beliefs, experiences and attitudes related to third year students' use of evidence-based practice in clinical physiotherapy education among students, clinical instructors and visiting teachers.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 189 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 20%
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 53 27%
Unknown 23 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 72 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 23%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 28 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,394,680
of 13,755,046 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#256
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,478
of 150,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them