You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dental neglect as a marker of broader neglect: a qualitative investigation of public health nurses’ assessments of oral health in preschool children
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-370 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline Bradbury-Jones, Nicola Innes, Dafydd Evans, Fiona Ballantyne, Julie Taylor |
Abstract |
Child neglect is a pernicious child protection issue with adverse consequences that extend to adulthood. Simultaneously, though it remains prevalent, childhood dental caries is a preventable disease. Public health nurses play a pivotal role in assessing oral health in children as part of general health surveillance. However, little is known about how they assess dental neglect or what their thresholds are for initiating targeted support or instigating child protection measures. Understanding these factors is important to allow improvements to be made in care pathways. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 18% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 18% |
Canada | 3 | 18% |
Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
Researcher | 17 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
Other | 40 | 20% |
Unknown | 52 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
Psychology | 9 | 5% |
Chemistry | 4 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Unknown | 57 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#927,768
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#986
of 14,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,442
of 197,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#9
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.