You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeted versus tailored multimedia patient engagement to enhance depression recognition and treatment in primary care: randomized controlled trial protocol for the AMEP2 study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel J Tancredi, Christina K Slee, Anthony Jerant, Peter Franks, Jasmine Nettiksimmons, Camille Cipri, Dustin Gottfeld, Julia Huerta, Mitchell D Feldman, Maja Jackson-Triche, Steven Kelly-Reif, Andrew Hudnut, Sarah Olson, Janie Shelton, Richard L Kravitz |
| Abstract |
Depression in primary care is common, yet this costly and disabling condition remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Persisting gaps in the primary care of depression are due in part to patients' reluctance to bring depressive symptoms to the attention of their primary care clinician and, when depression is diagnosed, to accept initial treatment for the condition. Both targeted and tailored communication strategies offer promise for fomenting discussion and reducing barriers to appropriate initial treatment of depression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 18% |
| Researcher | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#14,106,031
of 22,707,247 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,011
of 7,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,119
of 197,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#83
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,707,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.